How Broadly Can I Claim?
Broad claims are not forbidden. They are expensive, and they are expensive in two separate currencies. Enablement asks whether the specification lets a skilled person make and use everything claimed. Written description asks whether it shows the inventor actually possessed it. A patent can satisfy one and fail the other.
Neither page is published alone, because fixing one problem while believing you have fixed both is the failure mode.
Both decisions concern claims defined by what something does rather than what it is, which is a shape that recurs constantly in software. A claim to any system that achieves a result is functionally the same move as a claim to any antibody that binds a target.
The Pair
What These Pages Do Not Decide
- How broad your claims should be. Neither decision says narrow claims are the answer; both say breadth has to be matched by disclosure.
- Whether your specification enables or supports your claims.
- What structural characteristics would suffice. Juno was explicit that missing sequences were not the fatal defect, which means the answer is specific to what is claimed.
Educational, not legal advice. Consult a qualified patent attorney about claim scope and the disclosure that has to carry it.
Related
- What recent patent decisions add up to, the cross-case synthesis and the index to every case page.
- Software patents after Alice
- Continuation claims: what the Federal Circuit actually permits