Women Hold 12.8% of U.S. Patents. They Make Up 30% of the STEM Workforce.
The gap isn't talent — it's disclosure. A Nature study of 3.7 million U.S. patents found women's patents demonstrate higher novelty, originality, and technological generality. The inventions exist. The filing process loses them.
See How Automated Scanning HelpsThe numbers.
Research from USPTO, WIPO, and peer-reviewed studies paints a consistent picture: women innovate at high rates but patent at low rates. The gap is structural, not intellectual.
The 12.8% isn't evenly distributed. Women represent roughly 30% of inventors in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, 18% in chemistry, but just 6% in mechanical engineering. In software and electrical engineering, the rate falls between these extremes. The fields with the fewest women inventors are the same ones producing the most patents.
We measured this across 170 companies → Our Patent Representation Gap Index shows the gap company by company, with trend data showing who is improving.
What if the tool asked every line of code the same question?
ObviouslyNot's patent scanner analyzes source code and surfaces strategic concepts automatically. It doesn't filter by who wrote the code, who knows the patent attorney, or who considers their work "inventive enough."
Paste a repo URL
No need to self-identify as an inventor. The scanner analyzes your codebase for distinctive patterns automatically. First scan is free. Takes minutes, not hours.
Review scored concepts
The scanner surfaces strategic concepts with evidence citations from the actual code. Each concept includes a distinctiveness score and technical detail, pre-structured as a disclosure ready for review with a patent attorney. No jargon, no guesswork, no prior patent experience needed.
Protect what you built
Export discoveries as draft provisional applications (USPTO fees start at $65 for individual filers) or share with a patent attorney for review and filing. Our technical disclosure pipeline is free while in beta. The barrier drops from "know the patent system" to "paste a link."
Targeted support works.
A single USPTO pilot program for unrepresented inventors increased female applicants' grant rates by 16.8%. The bottleneck isn't talent or patent quality. It's getting to disclosure in the first place.
Once women disclose, university support infrastructure helps equalize prosecution outcomes. Mixed-gender teams produce the most disruptive inventions. The innovation is there. The filing process filters it out.
ObviouslyNot removes the disclosure bottleneck entirely. The scanner generates structured technical disclosures automatically from code. No blank forms, no patent language, no self-assessment required.
For universities and tech transfer offices.
University tech transfer offices are where the gender gap is most documented, and most fixable. The scanner surfaces innovations from researchers who would never have disclosed on their own.
Scan research repos
Connect faculty GitHub repos or internal GitLab instances. The scanner identifies distinctive implementations from code that would otherwise go unprotected.
Structured disclosures, not blank forms
Researchers review pre-generated technical disclosures with evidence from their code, not intimidating blank invention disclosure forms that require patent expertise.
Privacy-first
The local scanner runs entirely on your infrastructure. Source code never leaves your network. No compliance review required.
Your engineering team is sitting on unfiled patents.
When only self-promoters disclose, you miss innovations from women, junior engineers, underrepresented groups, and anyone who doesn't have a relationship with your IP team. The scanner asks every line of code the same question, regardless of who wrote it.
Read more on the patent gender gap
The patent gender gap by the numbers
Hub for the full series. Stats, history, fields, and what closes the gap.
Where women's patents disappear
The prosecution funnel, stage by stage. Where the gap widens between filing and grant.
The breakthrough penalty
PNAS 2026: the gap is concentrated on unconventional inventions, and the mechanism is institutional.
Closing strategies that work
Four evidence-based interventions: WashU WIT, USPTO RCT, Stanford OTL, USIPA pledge.